4.2 Article

Signal detection theory and vestibular perception: III. Estimating unbiased fit parameters for psychometric functions

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 225, 期 1, 页码 133-146

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3354-7

关键词

Maximum likelihood estimation; Generalized linear models; GLM; Psychophysics; Threshold; Vestibular

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [DC04158]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1S10RR028832]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Psychophysics generally relies on estimating a subject's ability to perform a specific task as a function of an observed stimulus. For threshold studies, the fitted functions are called psychometric functions. While fitting psychometric functions to data acquired using adaptive sampling procedures (e.g., staircase procedures), investigators have encountered a bias in the spread (slope or threshold) parameter that has been attributed to the serial dependency of the adaptive data. Using simulations, we confirm this bias for cumulative Gaussian parametric maximum likelihood fits on data collected via adaptive sampling procedures, and then present a bias-reduced maximum likelihood fit that substantially reduces the bias without reducing the precision of the spread parameter estimate and without reducing the accuracy or precision of the other fit parameters. As a separate topic, we explain how to implement this bias reduction technique using generalized linear model fits as well as other numeric maximum likelihood techniques such as the Nelder-Mead simplex. We then provide a comparison of the iterative bootstrap and observed information matrix techniques for estimating parameter fit variance from adaptive sampling procedure data sets. The iterative bootstrap technique is shown to be slightly more accurate; however, the observed information technique executes in a small fraction (0.005 %) of the time required by the iterative bootstrap technique, which is an advantage when a real-time estimate of parameter fit variance is required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据