4.2 Article

Nicotinamide prevents the long-term effects of perinatal asphyxia on apoptosis, non-spatial working memory and anxiety in rats

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 202, 期 1, 页码 1-14

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2103-z

关键词

Neonatal-hypoxia; Hippocampus; Mossy fibres sprouting; Behaviour; Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; Niacinamide; Rat

资金

  1. FONDECYT [1080447, 11070192]
  2. Regione Autonoma della Sardegna for Scientific Cooperation between Italy and Chile (Italy) [LR 19/96]
  3. Atlantic Innovation Fund (Canada) [181780]
  4. International Programme for Scientific cooperation CONICYT/DAAD [186-06-2006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is no established treatment for the long-term effects produced by perinatal asphyxia. Thus, we investigated the neuroprotection provided by nicotinamide against the effects elicited by perinatal asphyxia on hippocampus and behaviour observed at 30-90 days of age. Asphyxia was induced by immersing foetuses-containing uterine horns, removed from ready-to-deliver rats into a water bath at 37A degrees C for 20 min. Caesarean-delivered siblings were used as controls. Saline or nicotinamide (0.8 mmol/kg, i.p.) was administered to control and asphyxia-exposed animals 24, 48, and 72 h after birth. The animals were examined for morphological changes in hippocampus, focusing on delayed cell death and mossy fibre sprouting, and behaviour, focusing on cognitive behaviour and anxiety. At the age of 30-45 days, asphyxia-exposed rats displayed (1) increased apoptosis, assessed in whole hippocampus by nuclear Hoechst staining, and (2) increased mossy fibre sprouting, restricted to the stratum oriens of dorsal hippocampus, assessed by Timm's staining. Rats from the same cohorts displayed (3) deficits in non-spatial working memory, assessed by a novel object recognition task, and (4) increased anxiety, assessed by an elevated plus-maze test when examined at the age of 90 days. Nicotinamide prevented the effects elicited by perinatal asphyxia on apoptosis, working memory, and anxiety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据