4.8 Article

A proteomic chronology of gene expression through the cell cycle in human myeloid leukemia cells

期刊

ELIFE
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.01630

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Welcome Trust [083524/Z/07/Z, 097945/B/11/Z, 073980/Z/03/Z, 081361/Z/03/Z, 098051]
  2. European Union FP7 Prospects Network [HEALTH-F4-2008-201648]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K003801/1]
  4. EpiGeneSys Network [HEALTH-F4-2010-257082]
  5. Wellcome Trust [083524/Z/07/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  6. BBSRC [BB/H007849/1, BB/L004526/1, BB/K003801/1, BB/E010709/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. MRC [G0901002] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K003801/1, BB/L004526/1, BB/H007849/1, C20035, BB/E010709/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [G0901002] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Technological advances have enabled the analysis of cellular protein and RNA levels with unprecedented depth and sensitivity, allowing for an unbiased re-evaluation of gene regulation during fundamental biological processes. Here, we have chronicled the dynamics of protein and mRNA expression levels across a minimally perturbed cell cycle in human myeloid leukemia cells using centrifugal elutriation combined with mass spectrometry-based proteomics and RNA-Seq, avoiding artificial synchronization procedures. We identify myeloid-specific gene expression and variations in protein abundance, isoform expression and phosphorylation at different cell cycle stages. We dissect the relationship between protein and mRNA levels for both bulk gene expression and for over similar to 6000 genes individually across the cell cycle, revealing complex, genespecific patterns. This data set, one of the deepest surveys to date of gene expression in human cells, is presented in an online, searchable database, the Encyclopedia of Proteome Dynamics (http://www.peptracker.com/epd/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据