4.2 Article

Neurotensin Modulates the Migratory and Inflammatory Response of Macrophages under Hyperglycemic Conditions

期刊

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 2013, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2013/941764

关键词

-

资金

  1. COMPETE
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT-MEC) [SFRH/BD/60837/2009, SFRH/BD/30563/2006, PTDC/SAU-BEB/71395/2006, PTDC/SAU-MII/098567/2008, PEst-C/SAU/LA0001/2011]
  3. EFSD/JDRF/Novo Nordisk European Programme in Type 1 Diabetes Research
  4. Sociedade Portuguesa de Diabetologia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are characterized by an unsatisfactory inflammatory and migratory response. Skin inflammation involves the participation of many cells and particularly macrophages. Macrophage function can be modulated by neuropeptides; however, little is known regarding the role of neurotensin (NT) as a modulator of macrophages under inflammatory and hyperglycemic conditions. RAW 264.7 cells were maintained at 10/30 mM glucose, stimulated with/without LPS (1 mu g/mL), and treated with/without NT(10 nM). The results show that NT did not affect macrophage viability. However, NT reverted the hyperglycemia-induced impair in the migration of macrophages. The expression of IL-6 and IL-1 beta was significantly increased under 10 mM glucose in the presence of NT, while IL-1 beta and IL-12 expression significantly decreased under inflammatory and hyperglycemic conditions. More importantly, high glucose modulates NT and NT receptor expression under normal and inflammatory conditions. These results highlight the effect of NT on cell migration, which is strongly impaired under hyperglycemic conditions, as well as its effect in decreasing the proinflammatory status of macrophages under hyperglycemic and inflammatory conditions. These findings provide new insights into the potential therapeutic role of NT in chronic wounds, such as in DFU, characterized by a deficit in the migratory properties of cells and a chronic proinflammatory status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据