4.1 Article

Numerical Analysis of Erosion Caused by Biomimetic Axial Fan Blade

期刊

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2013/254305

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51175220, 51205161]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20100061110023, 20120061120051]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M511345]
  4. Projects of Cooperation and Innovation to National Potential Oil and Gas for Production and Research [OSR-04-04]
  5. Scientific and the Technological Development Project of Jilin Province [20130522066]
  6. Basic Scientific Research Expenses of Project of Jilin University [450060481176]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Damage caused by erosion has been reported in several industries for a wide range of situations. In the present work, a new method is presented to improve the erosion resistance of machine components by biomimetic method. A numerical investigation of solid particle erosion in the standard and biomimetic configuration blade of axial fan is presented. The analysis consists in the application of the discrete phase model, for modeling the solid particles flow, and the Eulerian conservation equations to the continuous phase. The numerical study employs computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, based on a finite volume method. User-defined function was used to define wear equation. Gas/solid flow axial fan was simulated to calculate the erosion rate of the particles on the fan blades and comparatively analyzed the erosive wear of the smooth surface, the groove-shaped, and convex hull-shaped biomimetic surface axial flow fan blade. The results show that the groove-shaped biomimetic blade antierosion ability is better than that of the other two fan blades. Thoroughly analyze of antierosion mechanism of the biomimetic blade from many factors including the flow velocity contours and flow path lines, impact velocity, impact angle, particle trajectories, and the number of collisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据