4.5 Review

HuR's role in gemcitabine efficacy: an exception or opportunity?

期刊

WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-RNA
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 435-444

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wrna.62

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the next few years, research teams will focus on, and millions of dollars will be spent on, sorting through cancer genomes. Undoubtedly, 'druggable' targets and events will be discovered that will improve our understanding and, hopefully, treatment of cancer. Highlighting an alternative to this 'genome-centric' approach, this review will further explore an underappreciated mechanism of gene expression regulation, posttranscription mRNA: protein interactions. A key molecule involved in this mode of gene regulation is HuR and we have shown that HuR levels and HuR cellular distribution can predict how pancreatic cancer patients responded to the standard of care chemotherapy (i.e., gemcitabine). HuR regulates posttranscriptional processes through: (1) association with specific mRNA cargos with ARE-rich sequences and (2) stress-induced increased cytoplasmic protein levels. Over multiple laboratories and diverse tumor types, it has been shown that HuR supports tumor survival through its regulation of tumor-promoting transcripts such as VEGF. In this article, we will highlight a recent discovery that this potent post-transcriptional gene regulatory mechanism has an impact on a common chemotherapeutic, gemcitabine. Specifically, we have identified the mechanism by which HuR can regulate a key gemcitabine metabolic enzyme, deoxycytidine kinase. We will use this example to explore and hypothesize the functional roles that HuR may have on anticancer drug therapies. We will survey novel high throughput global gene expression analysis tools to discover novel HuR targets. Future multidisciplinary approaches focused on HuR biology will provide critical events and 'druggable' targets in cancer that large-scale genomic sequencing efforts will miss. (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. WIREs RNA 2011 2 435-444 DOI: 10.1002/wrna.62

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据