4.6 Article

Experimental Study of Influence of Karst Aquifer on the Law of Water Inrush in Tunnels

期刊

WATER
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w10091211

关键词

karst aquifer; water inrush; hydraulic; model test; evolution law

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51479107, 51809158, 51609129]
  2. State key laboratory for Mine disaster prevention and control, cultivation base co-built by province
  3. Ministry of Shandong University of science and technology [MDPC201707]
  4. Shandong postdoctoral innovation project special Foundation [201502025]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2018JC048]
  6. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2018BEE045]
  7. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630780]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water inrush is a geological hazard often encountered in tunnel construction. In order to overcome problems encountered when using the existing water-inrush simulation model test, such as single function, low repetition utilization rate, and poor visibility, we developed a multi-type water-inrush model test system. Our test system can be a precursor to large-scale studies, handle multiple types, and perform serialization and visualization. We conducted cavity water-inrush simulation testing using this device, and studied the failure model of aquifuge rock. We reveal the evolution laws of water inrush from the cavity, including the initiation of fracture in the aquifuge rock, the formation of water-inrush channels, and the rupture of the aquifuge rock. By analyzing the seepage pressure changes at the monitoring points of the aquifuge rock, we divided the water-inrush process of the cave into a rack generation stage, a holing-through of fracture and forming of water-inrush channel stage, and a water-inrush stage. Test results show that the system is stable and reliable, only requiring a short test period, and can be used to guide large water-inrush testing and related projects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据