4.7 Article

The Combined Repetitive Oligopeptides of Clostridium difficile Toxin A Counteract Premature Cleavage of the Glucosyl-Transferase Domain by Stabilizing Protein Conformation

期刊

TOXINS
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 2162-2176

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins6072162

关键词

Clostridium difficile toxin; domain interaction; autoprocessing; cytotoxicity; microscale thermophoresis

资金

  1. Federal State of Lower Saxony, Niedersachsisches Vorab [VWZN2889]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB621]
  3. Hannover Medical School, Hochschulinterne Leistungsforderung (HiLF) project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Toxin A (TcdA) and B (TcdB) from Clostridium difficile enter host cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis. A prerequisite for proper toxin action is the intracellular release of the glucosyltransferase domain by an inherent cysteine protease, which is allosterically activated by inositol hexaphosphate (IP6). We found that in in vitro assays, the C-terminally-truncated TcdA(1-1065) was more efficient at IP6-induced cleavage compared with full-length TcdA. We hypothesized that the C-terminally-located combined repetitive oligopeptides (CROPs) interact with the N-terminal part of the toxin, thereby preventing autoproteolysis. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays and microscale thermophoresis confirmed binding between the CROPs and the glucosyltransferase (TcdA(1-542)) or intermediate (TcdA(1102-1847)) domain of TcdA, respectively. This interaction between the N-and C-terminus was not found for TcdB. Functional assays revealed that TcdB was more susceptible to inactivation by extracellular IP6-induced cleavage. In vitro autoprocessing and inactivation of TcdA, however, significantly increased, either by acidification of the surrounding milieu or following exchange of its CROP domain by the homologous CROP domain of TcdB. Thus, TcdA CROPs contribute to the stabilization and protection of toxin conformation in addition to function as the main receptor binding domain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据