4.6 Review

Concise Review: Optimizing Expansion of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells for Clinical Applications

期刊

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 3, 期 5, 页码 643-652

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0196

关键词

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell; Expansion; Progenitor; Bioreactor; Hypoxia; Growth factor

资金

  1. Whitaker International Program
  2. Institute of International Education
  3. ARCS Foundation, Inc.
  4. Training Program in Biomolecular Technology at the University of California,. Davis [T32-GM008799]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells(MSCs) have demonstrated success in the clinical treatment of hematopoietic pathologies and cardiovascular disease and are the focus of treating other diseases of the musculoskeletal, digestive, integumentary, and nervous systems. However, during the requisite two-dimensional (2D) expansion to achieve a clinically relevant number of cells, MSCs exhibit profound degeneration in progenitor potency. Proliferation, multilineage potential, and colony-forming efficiency are fundamental progenitor properties that are abrogated by extensive monolayer culture. To harness the robust therapeutic potential of MSCs, a consistent, rapid, and minimally detrimental expansion method is necessary. Alternative expansion efforts have exhibited promise in the ability to preserve MSC progenitor potency better than the 2D paradigm by mimicking features of the native bone marrow niche. MSCs have been successfully expanded when stimulated by growth factors, under reduced oxygen tension, and in three-dimensional bioreactors. MSC therapeutic value can be optimized for clinical applications by combining system inputs to tailor culture parameters for recapitulating the niche with probes that nondestructively monitor progenitor potency. The purpose of this review is to explore how modulations in the 20 paradigm affect MSC progenitor properties and to highlight recent efforts in alternative expansion techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据