4.7 Article

Retrievals of All-Weather Daily Air Temperature Using MODIS and AMSR-E Data

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 8387-8404

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs6098387

关键词

air temperature; MODIS; brightness temperature; AMSR-E

资金

  1. Agenda Program of the Rural Development Agency [PJ00997802]
  2. Korea Research Foundation in Republic of Korea [NRF-2013R1A1A4A01008632]
  3. NASA Terrestrial Hydrology program
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A4A01008632] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Satellite optical-infrared remote sensing from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) provides effective air temperature (T-a) retrieval at a spatial resolution of 5 km. However, frequent cloud cover can result in substantial signal loss and remote sensing retrieval error in MODIS T-a. We presented a simple pixel-wise empirical regression method combining synergistic information from MODIS T-a and 37 GHz frequency brightness temperature (T-b) retrievals from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) for estimating surface level T-a under both clear and cloudy sky conditions in the United States for 2006. The instantaneous T-a retrievals showed favorable agreement with in situ air temperature records from 40 AmeriFlux tower sites; mean R-2 correspondence was 86.5 and 82.7 percent, while root mean square errors (RMSE) for the T-a retrievals were 4.58 K and 4.99 K for clear and cloudy sky conditions, respectively. Daily mean T-a was estimated using the instantaneous T-a retrievals from day/night overpasses, and showed favorable agreement with local tower measurements (R-2 = 0.88; RMSE = 3.48 K). The results of this study indicate that the combination of MODIS and AMSR-E sensor data can produce T-a retrievals with reasonable accuracy and relatively fine spatial resolution (similar to 5 km) for clear and cloudy sky conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据