4.7 Article

Adoptive Transfer of EBV Specific CD8+ T Cell Clones Can Transiently Control EBV Infection in Humanized Mice

期刊

PLOS PATHOGENS
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004333

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sassella Foundation [10/02, 11/02, 12/02]
  2. Cancer Research Switzerland [KFS-02652-08-2010, KFS-3234-08-2013]
  3. Association for International Cancer Research [11-0516]
  4. KFSPMS of the University of Zurich
  5. KFSPHLD of the University of Zurich
  6. Baugarten Foundation
  7. Sobek Foundation
  8. Fondation Acteria
  9. Wellcome Trust
  10. Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research
  11. Medical Research Council
  12. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_143979, CRSII3_136241]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epstein Barr virus (EBV) infection expands CD8(+) T cells specific for lytic antigens to high frequencies during symptomatic primary infection, and maintains these at significant numbers during persistence. Despite this, the protective function of these lytic EBV antigen-specific cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that lytic EBV replication does not significantly contribute to virus-induced B cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo in a mouse model with reconstituted human immune system components (huNSG mice). However, we report a trend to reduction of EBV-induced lymphoproliferation outside of lymphoid organs upon diminished lytic replication. Moreover, we could demonstrate that CD8(+) T cells against the lytic EBV antigen BMLF1 can eliminate lytically replicating EBV-transformed B cells from lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) and in vivo, thereby transiently controlling high viremia after adoptive transfer into EBV infected huNSG mice. These findings suggest a protective function for lytic EBV antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells against EBV infection and against virus-associated tumors in extra-lymphoid organs. These specificities should be explored for EBV-specific vaccine development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据