4.6 Article

SWI/SNF-Like Chromatin Remodeling Factor Fun30 Supports Point Centromere Function in S-cerevisiae

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002974

关键词

-

资金

  1. BBSRC
  2. Babraham Institute for WRW through the Science Policy Committee
  3. Leonardo Da Vinci project Unipharma-Graduates
  4. Royal Society [500567]
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1129000, BB/F020236/1, BBS/E/B/000C0404] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G0701175] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. BBSRC [BBS/E/B/000C0404, BB/F020236/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [G0701175] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Budding yeast centromeres are sequence-defined point centromeres and are, unlike in many other organisms, not embedded in heterochromatin. Here we show that Fun30, a poorly understood SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeling factor conserved in humans, promotes point centromere function through the formation of correct chromatin architecture at centromeres. Our determination of the genome-wide binding and nucleosome positioning properties of Fun30 shows that this enzyme is consistently enriched over centromeres and that a majority of CENs show Fun30-dependent changes in flanking nucleosome position and/or CEN core micrococcal nuclease accessibility. Fun30 deletion leads to defects in histone variant Htz1 occupancy genome-wide, including at and around most centromeres. FUN30 genetically interacts with CSE4, coding for the centromere-specific variant of histone H3, and counteracts the detrimental effect of transcription through centromeres on chromosome segregation and suppresses transcriptional noise over centromere CEN3. Previous work has shown a requirement for fission yeast and mammalian homologs of Fun30 in heterochromatin assembly. As centromeres in budding yeast are not embedded in heterochromatin, our findings indicate a direct role of Fun30 in centromere chromatin by promoting correct chromatin architecture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据