4.4 Article

No requirement of TRPV1 in long-term potentiation or long-term depression in the anterior cingulate cortex

期刊

MOLECULAR BRAIN
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1756-6606-7-27

关键词

Anterior cingulate cortex; Long-term potentiation; Long-term depression; Multi-electrode array; Transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1; Chronic pain

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) operating grant
  2. Canada Research Chair (CRC)
  3. NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) [402555]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One major interest in the study of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) in sensory system is that it may serve as a drug target for treating chronic pain. While the roles of TRPV1 in peripheral nociception and sensitization have been well documented, less is known about its contribution to pain-related cortical plasticity. Here, we used 64 multi-electrode array recording to examine the potential role of TRPV1 in two major forms of synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). We found that pharmacological blockade of TRPV1 with either [(E)-3-(4-t-Butylphenyl)-N-(2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-6-yl)acrylamide] (AMG9810, 10 mu M) or N-(3-methoxyphenyl)-4-chlorocinnamide (SB366791, 20 mu M) failed to affect LTP induced by strong theta burst stimulation in the ACC of adult mice. Similarly, neither AMG9810 nor SB366791 blocked the cingulate LTD induced by low-frequency stimulation. Analysis of the results from different layers of the ACC obtained the same conclusions. Spatial distribution of LTP or LTD-showing channels among the ACC network was also unaltered by the TRPV1 antagonists. Since cortical LTP and LTD in the ACC play critical roles in chronic pain triggered by inflammation or nerve injury, our findings suggest that TRPV1 may not be a viable target for treating chronic pain, especially at the cortical level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据