4.6 Article

Association between maternal age at childbirth and child and adult outcomes in the off spring: a prospective study in five low-income and middle-income countries (COHORTS collaboration)

期刊

LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH
卷 3, 期 7, 页码 E366-E377

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00038-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust (UK)
  2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  3. US National Institutes of Health
  4. Guatemala (US National Institutes of Health)
  5. Guatemala (US National Science Foundation)
  6. Pelotas (Wellcome Trust)
  7. New Delhi (Indian Council of Medical Research, US National Center for Health Statistics)
  8. New Delhi (Medical Research Council [UK])
  9. New Delhi (British Heart Foundation)
  10. Birth To Twenty (Wellcome Trust)
  11. Birth To Twenty (Human Sciences Research Council)
  12. Birth To Twenty (South African Medical Research Council)
  13. Birth To Twenty (Mellon Foundation)
  14. Birth To Twenty (South-African Netherlands Programme on Alternative Development)
  15. Birth To Twenty (Anglo American Chairman's Fund, University of the Witwatersrand)
  16. Cebu (US National Institutes of Health)
  17. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A620_1016, MC_UU_12011/3, G0400519] Funding Source: researchfish
  18. MRC [MC_UP_A620_1016, G0400519, MC_UU_12011/3] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Both young and advanced maternal age is associated with adverse birth and child outcomes. Few studies have examined these associations in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and none have studied adult outcomes in the off spring. We aimed to examine both child and adult outcomes in five LMICs. Methods In this prospective study, we pooled data from COHORTS (Consortium for Health Orientated Research in Transitioning Societies)-a collaboration of five birth cohorts from LMICs (Brazil, Guatemala, India, the Philippines, and South Africa), in which mothers were recruited before or during pregnancy, and the children followed up to adulthood. We examined associations between maternal age and off spring birthweight, gestational age at birth, height-for-age and weight-for-height Z scores in childhood, attained schooling, and adult height, body composition (body-mass index, waist circumference, fat, and lean mass), and cardiometabolic risk factors (blood pressure and fasting plasma glucose concentration), along with binary variables derived from these. Analyses were unadjusted and adjusted for maternal socioeconomic status, height and parity, and breastfeeding duration. Findings We obtained data for 22 188 mothers from the five cohorts, enrolment into which took place at various times between 1969 and 1989. Data for maternal age and at least one outcome were available for 19 403 off spring (87%). In unadjusted analyses, younger (<= 19 years) and older (>= 35 years) maternal age were associated with lower birthweight, gestational age, child nutritional status, and schooling. After adjustment, associations with younger maternal age remained for low birthweight (odds ratio [OR] 1.18 (95% CI 1.02-1.36)], preterm birth (1.26 [1.03-1.53]), 2-year stunting (1.46 [1.25-1.70]), and failure to complete secondary schooling (1.38 [1.18-1.62]) compared with mothers aged 20-24 years. After adjustment, older maternal age remained associated with increased risk of preterm birth (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.05-1.67]), but children of older mothers had less 2-year stunting (0.64 [0.54-0.77]) and failure to complete secondary schooling (0.59 [0.48-0.71]) than did those with mothers aged 20-24 years. Off spring of both younger and older mothers had higher adult fasting glucose concentrations (roughly 0.05 mmol/L). Interpretation Children of young mothers in LMICs are disadvantaged at birth and in childhood nutrition and schooling. Efforts to prevent early childbearing should be strengthened. After adjustment for confounders, children of older mothers have advantages in nutritional status and schooling. Extremes of maternal age could be associated with disturbed off spring glucose metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据