4.1 Article

An automated evaluation system for analyzing antinociceptive effects on intracolonic capsaiciin-induced visceral pain-related licking behavior in mice

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2011.03.004

关键词

Automated analysis; Licking behavior; Mice; Visceral pain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The development of automated detection systems for animal behaviors is increasing in value in terms of saving time, objective analysis and reducing the need for well-trained experimenters. SCLABO (R) (Noveltec Inc., Kobe, Japan) is a commercially available analysis system originally developed for analyzing scratching behaviors in rodents, based on distances between points in videotaped images. Here, we used this software to automate analysis of abdominal licking behavior associated with visceral pain in mice.Methods: Yellow and green spots were applied to the snout and the lower abdominal region of mice respectively to provide reference points for automated analysis of video recordings. Abdominal licking behavior after intracolonic administration of 0.3% capsaicin solution as a measure of visceral pain was determined based on changes in the inter-spot distance. Results: A distance threshold between the colored spots was chosen based on manual measurements showing that 99% of minimal distances were below this threshold. Using this threshold, the number of licks determined by the automated analysis significantly and positively correlated with that determined by manual observation (R(2)= 0.95 and p<0.001). The neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist CR205171 A dose-dependently inhibited capsaicin-induced licking detected by automated analysis. Discussion: We demonstrated that visceral pain-related licking behaviors after intracolonic capsaicin treatment can be automatically detected by applying commercially available image analysis software. This automated experimental system is very efficient and useful to evaluate antinociceptive effect of a test compound on visceral pain. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据