4.6 Article

Tape casting of borosilicate glass/Al2O3 composites for LTCC substrate with various relative molecular masses of PVB

期刊

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 37-43

出版社

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIV
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-013-1456-4

关键词

casting; PVB; FTIR; rheological behavior; matching; microstructure

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2007AA03Z455]
  2. Science & Technology Pillar Program of Jiangsu Province, China [BE2009168]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China
  4. Innovation Foundation for Graduate Students of Jiangsu Province, China [CXZZ12_0415]
  5. Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) of China [IRT1146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dispersion, stabilization and rheological properties of the slurry with various relative molecular masses of PVB were studied. The sintering properties, microstructure and dielectric properties of borosilicate glass/Al2O3 composites were also investigated. The intensities of the typical vibrating bands decrease with the decrease of the relative molecular mass of PVB, which demonstrates that the content of butyral groups in PVB binders decreases correspondingly, leading to a rapid decrease in the viscosity of the mixed slurry. The solid content of samples increases with the decrease of the relative molecular mass of PVB, and this further leads to the increase of tape thickness, bulk density and dried-shrinkage coefficient of tapes. The bulk density, relative density, three-point strength and dielectric constant of sintered samples increase with the increase of the solid content, and the shrinkage and dielectric loss decrease. By contrast, samples for PVB-5s exhibit better properties of a bulk density of 3.10 g/cm(3), a relative density of 98.1%, a three-point strength of 208 MPa, a E > (r) value of 8.01, a tan delta value of 7.6x10(-4) at 10 MHz and a well matching with Ag electrodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据