4.0 Article

Despite modern off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting women fare worse than men

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2009.220277

关键词

Coronary heart disease; Gender differences; Off-pump surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Female gender is an established risk factor for worse outcomes after cardiac surgery. Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for coronary bypass grafting has an unknown effect on gender differences. Herein, we evaluate if gender has an impact on outcomes after modern off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). From 2002 to 2007, we analyzed 983 patients (male: n=807/female: n=176) who underwent OPCAB with symptomatic multi-vessel disease at our institution. The link between gender and outcome was assessed by multivariate analysis and logistic regression. A composite endpoint was constructed from: 30-day-mortality, renal failure, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, neurological complications, use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and conversion to CPB. Mortality was 3.2% in women vs. 1.8% in men (P=0.15) and the EuroSCORE was significantly correlated to gender (6.8 vs. 5.2; P<0.001), even after correction (P=0.036). Significant more occurrence of the composite endpoint was noted in women (39.8% vs. 29.0%; P=0.007) whereas for men the risk was much lower [odds ratio (OR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.92; P=0.015]. For both genders the logistic regression revealed a risk increase of 15% per one-point-increase of EuroSCORE (corrected) (OR 1.15; 95% CI: 1.10-1.19; P<0.0001). Women had more frequently a prolonged stay at ICU (P=0.006) and had a higher stroke rate (2.3% vs. 1.2%; P=0.29). Complete revascularization was achieved similarly (95% vs. 94%; P=0.93). OPCAB offers low mortality and excellent clinical outcome. Women are more likely to experience postoperative complications. Even if partially neutralized by avoiding CPB, gender differences remain present with modern OPCAB strategies. (C) 2010 Published by European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据