4.6 Article

A parallel and robust object tracking approach synthesizing adaptive Bayesian learning and improved incremental subspace learning

期刊

FRONTIERS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 1116-1135

出版社

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11704-018-6442-4

关键词

object tracking; Bayesian learning; subspace learning; particle filter; principal component analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61472289]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2016YFC0106305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel tracking algorithm which integrates two complementary trackers. Firstly, an improved Bayesian tracker(B-tracker) with adaptive learning rate is presented. The classification score of B-tracker reflects tracking reliability, and a low score usually results from large appearance change. Therefore, if the score is low, we decrease the learning rate to update the classifier fast so that B-tracker can adapt to the variation and vice versa. In this way, B-tracker is more suitable than its traditional version to solve appearance change problem. Secondly, we present an improved incremental subspace learning method tracker(S-tracker). We propose to calculate projected coordinates using maximum posterior probability, which results in a more accurate reconstruction error than traditional subspace learning tracker. Instead of updating at every time, we present a stop-strategy to deal with occlusion problem. Finally, we present an integrated framework(BAST), in which the pair of trackers run in parallel and return two candidate target states separately. For each candidate state, we define a tracking reliability metrics to measure whether the candidate state is reliable or not, and the reliable candidate state will be chosen as the target state at the end of each frame. Experimental results on challenging sequences show that the proposed approach is very robust and effective in comparison to the state-of-the-art trackers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据