4.7 Article

Ecological Variability and Carbon Stock Estimates of Mangrove Ecosystems in Northwestern Madagascar

期刊

FORESTS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 177-205

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f5010177

关键词

dynamics; Landsat; Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES); Madagascar; mangrove; Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD plus ); carbon

类别

资金

  1. Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association
  2. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mangroves are found throughout the tropics, providing critical ecosystem goods and services to coastal communities and supporting rich biodiversity. Despite their value, world-wide, mangroves are being rapidly degraded and deforested. Madagascar contains approximately 2% of the world's mangroves, >20% of which has been deforested since 1990 from increased extraction for charcoal and timber and conversion to small to large-scale agriculture and aquaculture. Loss is particularly prominent in the northwestern Ambaro and Ambanja bays. Here, we focus on Ambaro and Ambanja bays, presenting dynamics calculated using United States Geological Survey (USGS) national-level mangrove maps and the first localized satellite imagery derived map of dominant land-cover types. The analysis of USGS data indicated a loss of 7659 ha (23.7%) and a gain of 995 ha (3.1%) from 1990-2010. Contemporary mapping results were 93.4% accurate overall (Kappa 0.9), with producer's and user's accuracies >= 85%. Classification results allowed partitioning mangroves in to ecologically meaningful, spectrally distinct strata, wherein field measurements facilitated estimating the first total carbon stocks for mangroves in Madagascar. Estimates suggest that higher stature closed-canopy mangroves have average total vegetation carbon values of 146.8 Mg/ha (+/- 10.2) and soil organic carbon of 446.2 (+/- 36.9), supporting a growing body of studies that mangroves are amongst the most carbon-dense tropical forests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据