4.6 Article

Combined effects of marijuana and nicotine on memory performance and hippocampal volume

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 293, 期 -, 页码 46-53

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.029

关键词

Cannabis; Nicotine; Comorbid substance use; Hippocampus; Morphometry

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse/National Institutes of Health [K01 DA021632]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combined use of marijuana (MJ) and tobacco is highly prevalent in today's population. Individual use of either substance is linked to structural brain changes and altered cognitive function, especially with consistent reports of hippocampal volume deficits and poorer memory performance. However, the combined effects of MJ and tobacco on hippocampal structure and on learning and memory processes remain unknown. In this study, we examined both the individual and combined effects of MJ and tobacco on hippocampal volumes and memory performance in four groups of adults taken from two larger studies: MJ-only users (n =36), nicotine-only (Nic-only, n=19), combined marijuana and nicotine users (MJ + Nic, n = 19) and non-using healthy controls (n = 16). Total bilateral hippocampal volumes and memory performance (WMS-III logical memory) were compared across groups controlling for total brain size and recent alcohol use. Results found MJ and MJ + Nic groups had smaller total hippocampal volumes compared to Nic-only and controls. No significant difference between groups was found between immediate and delayed story recall. However, the controls showed a trend for larger hippocampal volumes being associated with better memory scores, while MJ + Nic users showed a unique inversion, whereby smaller hippocampal volume was associated with better memory. Overall, results suggest abnormalities in the brain-behavior relationships underlying memory processes with combined use of marijuana and nicotine use. Further research will need to address these complex interactions between MJ and nicotine. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据