4.6 Review

Cost-effectiveness of interventions for perinatal anxiety and/or depression: a systematic review

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022022

关键词

health economics; mental healths; psychiatry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Anxiety and/or depression during pregnancy or year after childbirth is the most common complication of childbearing. Economic evaluations of interventions for the prevention or treatment of perinatal anxiety and/or depression (PAD) were systematically reviewed with the aim of guiding researchers and commissioners of perinatal mental health services towards potentially cost-effective strategies. Methods Electronic searches were conducted on the MEDLINE, PsycINFO and NHS Economic Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment databases in September 2017 to identify relevant economic evaluations published since January 2000. Two stages of screening were used with prespecified inclusion/exclusion criteria. A data extraction form was designed prior to the literature search to capture key data. A published checklist was used to assess the quality of publications identified. Results Of the 168 non-duplicate citations identified, 8 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review; all but one focussing solely on postnatal depression in mothers. Interventions included prevention (3/8), treatment (3/8) or identification plus treatment (2/8). Two interventions were likely to be cost-effective, both incorporated identification plus treatment. Where the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was reported, interventions ranged from being dominant (cheaper and more effective than usual care) to costing 39 875/QALY. Conclusions Uncertainty and heterogeneity across studies in terms of setting and design make it difficult to make direct comparisons or draw strong conclusions. However, the two interventions incorporating identification plus treatment of perinatal depression were both likely to be cost-effective. Many gaps were identified in the economic evidence, such as the cost-effectiveness of interventions for perinatal anxiety, antenatal depression or interventions for fathers. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016051133.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Economics

Health State Values of Deaf British Sign Language (BSL) Users in the UK: An Application of the BSL Version of the EQ-5D-5L

Gemma E. Shields, Katherine D. Rogers, Alys Young, Sofia Dedotsi, Linda M. Davies

APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Real-world evidence use in assessments of cancer drugs by NICE

Ash Bullement, Tanja Podkonjak, Mark J. Robinson, Eugene Benson, Ross Selby, Anthony J. Hatswell, Gemma E. Shields

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE (2020)

Article Economics

A comparison of partitioned survival analysis and state transition multi-state modelling approaches using a case study in oncology

Holly Cranmer, Gemma E. Shields, Ash Bullement

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS (2020)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Protocol for the economic evaluation of metacognitive therapy for cardiac rehabilitation participants with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression

Gemma E. Shields, Adrian Wells, Patrick Doherty, David Reeves, Lora Capobianco, Anthony Heagerty, Deborah Buck, Linda M. Davies

BMJ OPEN (2020)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Challenges in synthesising cost-effectiveness estimates

Gemma E. Shields, Jamie Elvidge

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2020)

Article Economics

A General Public Study on Preferences and Welfare Impacts of Antimicrobial Resistance in the United Kingdom

Maria Veronica Dorgali, Alberto Longo, Caroline Vass, Gemma Shields, Roger Harrison, Riccardo Scarpa, Marco Boeri

Summary: Research has shown that the risk of antimicrobial resistance is relevant and important to the general public. The high willingness to pay for containing antimicrobial resistance suggests that large investments in policies or interventions are justified.

PHARMACOECONOMICS (2022)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Delivery preferences for psychological intervention in cardiac rehabilitation: a pilot discrete choice experiment

Gemma Elizabeth Shields, Stuart Wright, Adrian Wells, Patrick Doherty, Lora Capobianco, Linda Mary Davies

Summary: This pilot study using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) investigated preferences for delivery attributes of a psychological therapy intervention in CR patients with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. The study found that sampled participants tended to prefer home-based psychological therapy in CR and wanted to receive information before initiating therapy. Limited statistically significant results were identified, indicating the need for further research.

OPEN HEART (2021)

Article Economics

Out of Date or Best Before? A Commentary on the Relevance of Economic Evaluations Over Time

Gemma E. Shields, Becky Pennington, Ash Bullement, Stuart Wright, Jamie Elvidge

Summary: The impact of time on historical economic evaluations is significant. Researchers need to consider whether time would affect the results of their studies. Ignoring the impact of time may lead to the use of outdated evidence.

PHARMACOECONOMICS (2022)

Article Economics

Factors Limiting Subgroup Analysis in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and a Call for Transparency

Gemma E. Shields, Mark Wilberforce, Paul Clarkson, Tracey Farragher, Arpana Verma, Linda M. Davies

Summary: The use of population averages in cost-effectiveness analysis may hide important differences across subgroups. Many challenges may limit the robust inclusion of subgroup analysis in cost-effectiveness analysis, including difficulties with prespecifying and justifying subgroup analysis, identifying implementable subgroups, resource and data requirements, and statistical and ethical concerns. Greater transparency of subgroup reporting is recommended to address these challenges in future research.

PHARMACOECONOMICS (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Discrete choice experiment to investigate preferences for psychological intervention in cardiac rehabilitation

Gemma E. Shields, Adrian Wells, Stuart Wright, Caroline M. Vass, Patrick Joseph Doherty, Lora Capobianco, Linda M. Davies

Summary: This study investigated preferences for attributes of a psychological therapy intervention in cardiac rehabilitation. The results showed a preference for psychological therapy, particularly individual therapy provided by a specialized professional with lower cost. Participants also preferred to receive information prior to starting therapy. The results for the location attribute were inconsistent and difficult to interpret.

BMJ OPEN (2022)

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Cost-effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review

Gemma E. Shields, Aleix Rowlandson, Garima Dalal, Stuart Nickerson, Holly Cranmer, Lora Capobianco, Patrick Doherty

Summary: This review found that home-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) interventions are cost-effective compared to centre-based options. However, the evidence base is limited in size and heterogeneous in methods, and there are several limitations that need to be addressed in future research.
Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A Systematic Review of Methods to Incorporate External Evidence into Trial-Based Survival Extrapolations for Health Technology Assessment

Ash Bullement, Matthew D. Stevenson, Gianluca Baio, Gemma E. Shields, Nicholas R. Latimer

Summary: This review aimed to identify, describe, and categorize established methods to incorporate external evidence into survival extrapolation for health technology assessment (HTA). Across 18 methods identified from 22 studies, common themes included the use of informative prior(s), piecewise approaches, and general population adjustment. Most methods were applied in cancer populations. Further research is needed to assess the differences between these methods.

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2023)

Article Economics

An Investigation into the Relationship Between Choice of Model Structure and How to Adjust for Subsequent Therapies Using a Case Study in Oncology

Holly L. Cranmer, Gemma E. Shields, Ash Bullement

Summary: The study compares two different model structures to analyze the impact of adjusting treatment outcomes on model results for patients with multiple myeloma.

APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY (2023)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Youth Metacognitive Therapy (YoMeta): protocol for a single-blind randomised feasibility trial of a transdiagnostic intervention versus treatment as usual in 11-16-year-olds with common mental health problems

Adrian Wells, Karin Carter, Mark Hann, Gemma Shields, Paul Wallis, Beth Cooper, Lora Capobianco

Summary: This study aims to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of group Metacognitive therapy (MCT) for children and young people with common mental health problems. The therapy may improve access to treatment, reduce waiting times, and improve outcomes. The results of this study will provide important information and data for future research in this area.

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Utilising Patient and Public Involvement in Stated Preference Research in Health: Learning from the Existing Literature and a Case Study

Gemma E. Shields, Lindsey Brown, Adrian Wells, Lora Capobianco, Caroline Vass

Summary: Publications rarely discuss PPI activities in discrete choice experiments of healthcare interventions. This paper presents examples and a detailed case study showcasing the benefits of incorporating PPI across the preference research stages, despite challenges such as time, cost, and expectations. Further research comparing methods related to PPI in preference research would strengthen the literature.

PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2021)

暂无数据