4.5 Article

Odontogenic ameloblast-associated protein (ODAM) in gingival crevicular fluid for site-specific diagnostic value of periodontitis: a pilot study

期刊

BMC ORAL HEALTH
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0609-0

关键词

Odontogenic ameloblast-associated protein (ODAM); Periodontitis; Gingival crevicular fluid; Biomarker

资金

  1. Korean Health Technology R&D project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI16C0220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Odontogenic Ameloblast-Associated Protein (ODAM) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) can provide evidence of the detachment of junctional epithelium from the tooth surface by periodontitis. This study sought to investigate the ability of ODAM to reflect the severity of periodontitis at a site-specific level; thus whether there was a relationship between clinical diagnostic parameters and the value of ODAM in GCF was analyzed. Methods: Eight periodontitis patients with various severities were enrolled, and the clinical parameters and samples of GCF were obtained from 44 to 60 sites of each subject The ODAM concentration was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Correlation analyses between clinical parameters and ODAM values and unadjusted and adjusted (linear) mixed model analyses were performed. The accuracy of ODAM to reflect sites having a probing depth (PD) >= 5 mm and a positive bleeding on probing (BOP) was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Results: A total of 424 GCF samples were collected. The mean ODAM concentration from each patient varied from 0.2 to 1.52 ng/ml. Correlations between PD or clinical attachment level (CAL) and ODAM values were found (p < 0.0001). An adjusted linear mixed model showed that PD or CAL were associated with ODAM values (p < 0.05). The area under the curve of ODAM, which reflected sites with PD >= 5 mm and positive BOP, was 0.661 (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This result shows the possibility of GCF ODAM as a site-specific biomarker for periodontal tissue destruction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据