4.7 Review

Stem-Cell Niche Based Comparative Analysis of Chemical and Nano-mechanical Material Properties Impacting Ex Vivo Expansion and Differentiation of Hematopoietic and Mesenchymal Stem Cells

期刊

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 25-42

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201200169

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R21HL106397]
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R21HL106397] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability of stem cells to self-renew with minimal or no differentiation and, when appropriately cued, to give rise to many types of progenitor and mature cells, is the basis for applications in regenerative and transfusion medicine, but also in drug discovery and in vitro toxicology. Inspired by the complex interactions between stem cells and their microenvironment, the so-called stem-cell niche, the properties of supporting biomaterials, including surface biochemistry, topography (type, size, organization, and geometry of nanostructures), and mechanical properties, have been identified as important determinants of stem-cell fate in vitro. 3D culture environments that could recapitulate the complexity of the in vivo stem-cell microenvironment could further expand the complexity and repertoire of engineered environments with exciting translational applications. Herein, the material aspects that affect the expansion and differentiation fate of adult hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), two powerful cell types that co-reside in the bone-marrow niche, but with distinct, sometime complementary, differentiation fates, properties, and translational applications, are examined. Although MSCs are adherent cells and, in contrast, HSPCs are non-or weakly adherent cells, both can sense and respond to material properties, including surface (bio) chemistry, ECM composition, topography, and matrix elasticity, possibly through similar molecular mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据