4.5 Review

Endovascular Therapy for Brainstem Arteriovenous Malformations

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 481-488

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.099

关键词

AVM; Brainstem; Curative; Embolization; Endovascular; Multimodal; Treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brainstem arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) represent similar to 5% of all intracranial AVMs and carry a higher risk of hemorrhage than their supratentorial counterparts. There is a high and near-uniform mortality with initial and recurrent episodes of hemorrhage. Brainstem AVMs may also present symptomatically with focal neurologic deficits or hydrocephalus. Treatment is indicated for ruptured and symptomatic brainstem AVMs, as well as those possessing high-risk angioarchitectural features. Microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery are ideal therapeutic options when feasible. Embolization is most commonly used as adjunctive treatment before surgery or stereotactic radiosurgical irradiation. Preoperative embolization facilitates microsurgical resection and reduces intraoperative and postoperative hemorrhage rates. Use of embolization preradiosurgically helps to reduce nidal size, transforming a large lesion to a size amenable to radiosurgical intervention, increasing the probability of obliteration, decreasing procedural hemorrhage risk, stabilizing the lesion until radiotherapeutic effect achieves obliteration, and providing interval symptomatic resolution. Embolization may also be used effectively as stand-alone monotherapy for small lesions with 1 or 2 arterial feeders not supplying eloquent parenchyma. Although an extensive evidence base exists for clinical usefulness of stereotactic radiosurgery as monotherapy or in combination with other therapeutic modalities, only a few studies have reported specifically on obliteration and complication rates with monotherapeutic embolization in the treatment of brainstem AVMs. The potential role of embolization as monotherapy for brainstem AVMs is reviewed and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据