4.7 Article

Mesenchymal stem cells alleviate experimental autoimmune cholangitis through immunosuppression and cytoprotective function mediated by galectin-9

期刊

STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-0979-x

关键词

Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells; Primary biliary cholangitis; Galectin-9; Inflammation

资金

  1. China National Natural Science Foundation [91442119]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) play an anti-inflammatory role by secreting certain bioactive molecules to exert their therapeutic effects for disease treatment. However, the underlying mechanism of MSCs in chronic autoimmune liver diseases-primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), for example-remains to be elucidated. Methods: Human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) were injected intravenously into 2-octynoic acid coupled to bovine serum albumin (2OA-BSA)-induced autoimmune cholangitis mice. Serum levels of biomarkers and autoantibodies, histologic changes in the liver, diverse CD4(+) T-cell subsets in different tissues, and chemokine activities were analyzed. Moreover, we investigated galectin-9 (Gal-9) expression and its function in UC-MSCs. Results: In this study, UC-MSC transplantation (UC-MSCT) significantly ameliorated liver inflammation, primarily by diminishing T helper 1 (Th1) and Th17 responses as well as modifying liver chemokine activities in experimental autoimmune cholangitis mice. Mechanistically, UC-MSCs significantly repressed the proliferation of CD4+ T cells and suppressed the differentiation of Th1 and Th17 cells, which was likely dependent on Gal-9. Furthermore, the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathways were involved in the production of Gal-9 in UC-MSCs. Conclusions: These results suggest that Gal-9 contributes significantly to UC-MSC-mediated therapeutic effects and improve our understanding of the immunomodulatory mechanisms of MSCs in the treatment of PBC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据