4.5 Article

Nestling recognition in red-rumped and barn swallows

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 11, 页码 1821-1826

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-015-1994-x

关键词

Cavity-nest; Cross-fostering; Food allocation; Hirundo daurica; Hirundo rustica; Nestling recognition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31260514, 31272328, 31472013]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0761]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nestling recognition and rejection is a rare defense strategy against avian brood parasitism that was previously thought to be too costly to evolve. Recently, several examples of nestling recognition and rejection by fosterers have been reported. Here, we tested for chick recognition ability in red-rumped swallows (Hirundo daurica), which build closed nests and do not discriminate against foreign eggs, by using cross-fostering experiments while controlling for responses to intraspecific and interspecific parasitism in closely related swallow species. We show that red-rumped swallows do not discriminate against conspecific or barn swallow (H. rustica) nestlings, but eject or reject cuckoo nestlings cross-fostered in red-rumped swallow nests by starving the introduced chicks to death. Assuming that the behavior of red-rumped swallows evolved in response to cuckoo parasitism, this study represents novel empirical evidence showing that chick discrimination evolved when brood parasites have completely evaded host defenses at the egg stage. The evolution of such recognition ability may be explained as a defense against avian brood parasitism by small-sized cuckoos or a pre-adaptation to specific communication between host parents and offspring. Our results are consistent with the rarer enemy hypothesis predicting that nestling discrimination should evolve only in hosts that accept all naturally laid parasite eggs and thus do not decrease effective parasitism rate at the nestling stage. In contrast, the findings were inconsistent with a number of alternative hypotheses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据