4.7 Article

Genomic analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii prophages reveals remarkable diversity and suggests profound impact on bacterial virulence and fitness

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33800-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [PTDC/BBB-BSS/6471/2014 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016678)]
  2. COMPETE 2020 [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684]
  3. BioTecNorte operation - European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020 - Programa Operacional Regional do Norte [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004]
  4. FCT [SFRH/BPD/94648/2013]
  5. [UID/BIO/04469/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent nomination by the World Health Organization of Acinetobacter baumannii as the number one priority pathogen for the development of new antibiotics is a direct consequence of its fast evolution of pathogenicity, and in particular of multidrug resistance. While the development of new antibiotics is critical, understanding the mechanisms behind the crescent bacterial antibiotic resistance is equally relevant. Often, resistance and other bacterial virulence elements are contained on highly mobile pieces of DNA that can easily spread to other bacteria. Prophages are one of the mediators of this form of gene transfer, and have been frequently found in bacterial genomes, often offering advantageous features to the host. Here we assess the contribution of prophages for the evolution of A. baumannii pathogenicity. We found prophages to be notably diverse and widely disseminated in A. baumannii genomes. Also remarkably, A. baumannii prophages encode for multiple putative virulence factors that may be implicated in the bacterium's capacity to colonize host niches, evade the host immune system, subsist in unfavorable environments, and tolerate antibiotics. Overall our results point towards a significant contribution of prophages for the dissemination and evolution of pathogenicity in A. baumannii, and highlight their clinical relevance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据