4.7 Article

Misfolded SOD1 pathology in sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31773-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  2. W. Garfield Weston Foundation through the Weston Brain Institute
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  5. Bertil Hallsten Foundation
  6. Torsten and Ragnar Soderberg Foundation
  7. Swedish Brain Fund
  8. Stratneuro Initiative
  9. Vasterbotten County Council
  10. Kempe Foundations
  11. Canada research Chair
  12. Fond de recherche du Quebec en sante (FRQS)
  13. ALS Canada Doctoral Research award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aggregation of mutant superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) is a pathological hallmark of a subset of familial ALS patients. However, the possible role of misfolded wild type SOD1 in human ALS is highly debated. To ascertain whether or not misfolded SOD1 is a common pathological feature in non-SOD1 ALS, we performed a blinded histological and biochemical analysis of post mortem brain and spinal cord tissues from 19 sporadic ALS, compared with a SOD1 A4V patient as well as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and non-neurological controls. Multiple conformation-or misfolded-specific antibodies for human SOD1 were compared. These were generated independently by different research groups and were compared using standardized conditions. Five different misSOD1 staining patterns were found consistently in tissue sections from SALS cases and the SOD1 A4V patient, but were essentially absent in AD and non-neurological controls. We have established clear experimental protocols and provide specific guidelines for working, with conformational/misfolded SOD1-specific antibodies. Adherence to these guidelines will aid in the comparison of the results of future studies and better interpretation of staining patterns. This blinded, standardized and unbiased approach provides further support for a possible pathological role of misSOD1 in SALS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据