4.7 Article

Inflammation is a key contributor to ovarian cancer cell seeding

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30261-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through the Ovarian Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-17-1-0144, W81XWH-16-1-0190]
  2. National Cancer Institute [R21CA194626, 1R01CA208753]
  3. Cantor-UCLA Women's Health Center Executive Advisory Board & NCATS UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute grant [UL1TR000124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of ovarian cancer dramatically increases in early menopause but the factors contributing to cancer onset are unclear. Most ovarian cancers originate in the fallopian tube with subsequent implantation of malignant cells into the ovary. However, the events and conditions that lead to cancer cell implantation are unknown. To quantify which conditions are conducive to the seeding of cancer cells in an immunocompetent mouse model, we surgically implanted mouse ovarian cancer cells into the oviducts of syngeneic mice and simulated conditions associated with ovulatory wound repair, incessant ovulation, ovarian surface scarring, and aging. We found that the dominant site of cancer cell seeding was not the ovary but the nearby surgical wound site, which was associated with a strong and persistent inflammatory reaction. Conditions in the ovary associated with inflammation, such as acute ovulatory wound repair, active healing of the scarred ovarian surface, and mouse aging, contributed to increased seeding of the cancer cells to the surgical wound site and tissues surrounding the ovary. Changes in the ovary not accompanied by inflammation, such as completed ovulatory cycles and fully-healed scars on the ovarian surface, did not contribute to increased cancer cell seeding. We conclude that inflammation is the most likely mechanism by which ovulation and postmenopausal events contribute to the increased risk of ovarian cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据