4.7 Article

Impact of sequencing depth and read length on single cell RNA sequencing data of T cells

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12989-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)
  2. Australian Centre for HIV and HCV Research (ACH2)
  3. University International Postgraduate Award UNSW Australia
  4. NHMRC [1043067, 1130128, 1060443, 1067590, 1128416]
  5. NHMRC/National Heart Foundation [1105271]
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1105271, 1130128, 1128416, 1067590, 1060443] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides great potential in measuring the gene expression profiles of heterogeneous cell populations. In immunology, scRNA-seq allowed the characterisation of transcript sequence diversity of functionally relevant T cell subsets, and the identification of the full length T cell receptor (TCR alpha beta), which defines the specificity against cognate antigens. Several factors, e.g. RNA library capture, cell quality, and sequencing output affect the quality of scRNA-seq data. We studied the effects of read length and sequencing depth on the quality of gene expression profiles, cell type identification, and TCR alpha beta reconstruction, utilising 1,305 single cells from 8 publically available scRNA-seq datasets, and simulation-based analyses. Gene expression was characterised by an increased number of unique genes identified with short read lengths (< 50 bp), but these featured higher technical variability compared to profiles from longer reads. Successful TCR alpha beta reconstruction was achieved for 6 datasets (81% - 100%) with at least 0.25 millions (PE) reads of length > 50 bp, while it failed for datasets with < 30 bp reads. Sufficient read length and sequencing depth can control technical noise to enable accurate identification of TCR alpha beta and gene expression profiles from scRNA-seq data of T cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据