4.7 Article

Glycolipid-peptide conjugate vaccines enhance CD8+ T cell responses against human viral proteins

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14690-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Thompson Family Foundation
  2. Genesis Oncology Trust
  3. Royal Arch Masonic Centennial Award
  4. Health Research Council of New Zealand [14/502]
  5. New Zealand Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment [RTV1603]
  6. NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research
  7. Gui Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An important goal of vaccination against viruses and virus-driven cancers is to elicit cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells specific for virus-derived peptides. CD8(+) T cell responses can be enhanced by engaging help from natural killer T (NKT) cells. We have produced synthetic vaccines that induce strong peptide-specific CD8(+) T cell responses in vivo by incorporating an NKT cell-activating glycolipid. Here we examine the effect of a glycolipid-peptide conjugate vaccine incorporating an NKT cell-activating glycolipid linked to an MHC class I-restricted peptide from a viral antigen in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The vaccine induces CD1d-dependent activation of human NKT cells following enzymatic cleavage, activates human dendritic cells in an NKT-cell dependent manner, and generates a pool of activated antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells with cytotoxic potential. Compared to unconjugated peptide, the vaccine upregulates expression of genes encoding interferon-gamma, CD137 and granzyme B. A similar vaccine incorporating a peptide from the clinically-relevant human papilloma virus (HPV) 16 E7 oncoprotein induces cytotoxicity against peptide-expressing targets in vivo, and elicits a better antitumor response in a model of E7-expressing lung cancer than its unconjugated components. Glycolipid-peptide conjugate vaccines may prove useful for the prevention or treatment of viral infections and tumors that express viral antigens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据