4.7 Article

SNAP-25b-deficiency increases insulin secretion and changes spatiotemporal profile of Ca2+ oscillations in β cell networks

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08082-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sven Mattssons Foundation
  2. Family Erling-Persson Foundation
  3. Karolinska Institutet funds
  4. Magnus Bergvalls Foundation
  5. Gun and Bertil Stohnes Foundation
  6. Fogelstroms Foundation
  7. Rolf Luft Foundation
  8. Sigurd and Elsa Goljes Foundation
  9. Slovenian Research Agency [P3-0396]
  10. Rolf Luft Fellowship
  11. Fernstroms Foundation
  12. KI travel funds for PhD students

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SNAP-25 is a protein of the core SNARE complex mediating stimulus-dependent release of insulin from pancreatic beta cells. The protein exists as two alternatively spliced isoforms, SNAP-25a and SNAP25b, differing in 9 out of 206 amino acids, yet their specific roles in pancreatic beta cells remain unclear. We explored the effect of SNAP-25b-deficiency on glucose-stimulated insulin release in islets and found increased secretion both in vivo and in vitro. However, slow photo-release of caged Ca2+ in beta cells within pancreatic slices showed no significant differences in Ca2+-sensitivity, amplitude or rate of exocytosis between SNAP-25b-deficient and wild-type littermates. Therefore, we next investigated if Ca2+ handling was affected in glucose-stimulated beta cells using intracellular Ca2+-imaging and found premature activation and delayed termination of [Ca2+] i elevations. These findings were accompanied by less synchronized Ca2+-oscillations and hence more segregated functional beta cell networks in SNAP-25b-deficient mice. Islet gross morphology and architecture were maintained in mutant mice, although sex specific compensatory changes were observed. Thus, our study proposes that SNAP-25b in pancreatic beta cells, except for participating in the core SNARE complex, is necessary for accurate regulation of Ca2+-dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据