4.7 Article

A broad range quorum sensing inhibitor working through sRNA inhibition

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09886-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish Council for Strategic Research (Det Strategiske Forskningsrad)
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Kirsten & Freddy Johansen Foundation
  4. BBSRC [BB/L007959/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MR/J006874/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L007959/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Lundbeck Foundation [R198-2015-486] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MR/J006874/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the last decade, chemical control of bacterial virulence has received considerable attention. Ajoene, a sulfur-rich molecule from garlic has been shown to reduce expression of key quorum sensing regulated virulence factors in the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Here we show that the repressing effect of ajoene on quorum sensing occurs by inhibition of small regulatory RNAs (sRNA) in P. aeruginosa as well as in Staphylococcus aureus, another important human pathogen that employs quorum sensing to control virulence gene expression. Using various reporter constructs, we found that ajoene lowered expression of the sRNAs RsmY and RsmZ in P. aeruginosa and the small dual-function regulatory RNA, RNAIII in S. aureus, that controls expression of key virulence factors. We confirmed the modulation of RNAIII by RNA sequencing and found that the expression of many QS regulated genes encoding virulence factors such as hemolysins and proteases were lowered in the presence of ajoene in S. aureus. Importantly, our findings show that sRNAs across bacterial species potentially may qualify as targets of anti-virulence therapy and that ajoene could be a lead structure in search of broad-spectrum compounds transcending the Gram negative-positive borderline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据