4.7 Article

Characterization of the Mollusc RIG-I/MAVS Pathway Reveals an Archaic Antiviral Signalling Framework in Invertebrates

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08566-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31530079]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB126402]
  3. Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [CARS-48]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of Western Pacific Ocean System: Structure, Dynamics and Consequences [XDA11000000]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the mitochondrial antiviral signalling protein (MAVS)-dependent RIG-I-like receptor (RLR) signalling pathway in the cytosol plays an indispensable role in the antiviral immunity of the host, surprising little is known in invertebrates. Here we characterized the major members of RLR pathway and investigated their signal transduction a Molluscs. We show that genes involved in RLR pathway were significantly induced during virus challenge, including CgRIG-I-1, CgMAVS, CgTRAF6 (TNF receptor-associated factor 6), and CgIRFs (interferon regulatory factors. Similar to human RIG-I, oyster RIG-I-1 could bind poly(I:C) directly in vitro and interact with oyster MAVS via its caspase activation and recruitment domains. We also show that transmembrane domain-dependent self-association of CgMAVS may be crucial for its signalling and that CgMAVS can recruit the downstream signalling molecule, TRAF6, which can subsequently activate NF-kappa B signal pathway. Moreover, oyster IRFs appeared to function downstream of CgMAVS and were able to activate the interferon beta promoter and interferon stimulated response elements in mammalian cells. These results establish invertebrate MAVS-dependent RLR signalling for the first time and would be helpful for deciphering the antiviral mechanisms of invertebrates and understanding the development of the vertebrate RLR network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据