4.7 Article

A Pilot Study of 18F-Alfatide PET/CT Imaging for Detecting Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03296-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC81372413, NSFC81172133]
  2. special fund for Scientific Research in the Public Interest [201402011]
  3. Outstanding Youth Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [JQ201423]
  4. projects of medical and health technology development program in Shandong province [2014WS0058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiogenesis plays a key role in tumor development and alpha(v)beta(3) integrin are overexpressed on the endothelial cell surface of newly forming vessels. F-18-Alfatide has favorable properties for alpha(v)beta(3) integrin targeting and showed potential for imaging angiogenesis with Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). In this study, 13 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent F-18-Alfatide PET/CT before surgery were enrolled. The uptake of all dissected lymph nodes (LNs) of F-18-Alfatide were assessed visually and analyzed with a maximum and mean standard uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean) and SUV ratios. LN metastases were pathologically confirmed and 20 of 196 LNs were malignant. All malignant LNs were successfully visualized on 18F-Alfatide PET/CT in patients and the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy was 100.0%, 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. SUVmax, SUVmean and SUV ratios in malignant LNs were significantly higher than in benign LNs for NSCLC patients (P < 0.001). The same result was observed in patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (P < 0.001). The F-18-Alfatide parameter shows high sensitivity (83.9-100%), specificity (78.6-96.7%) and accuracy (81.7-96.9%) according to thresholds calculated from receiver operating characteristic curve. Our results suggest that F-18-Alfatide PET/CT is valuable in the diagnosis of metastatic LNs for NSCLC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据