4.7 Article

The ubiquitin ligase Cullin5SOCS2 regulates NDR1/STK38 stability and NF-κB transactivation

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep42800

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  2. Danish Cancer Society
  3. Danish Research Council
  4. His Majesty Trust Fund [SR/MED/BIOC/13/01]
  5. Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research [PI Jesper Velgaard Olsen] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. The Danish Cancer Society [R90-A6060] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SOCS2 is a pleiotropic E3 ligase. Its deficiency is associated with gigantism and organismal lethality upon inflammatory challenge. However, mechanistic understanding of SOCS2 function is dismal due to our unawareness of its protein substrates. We performed a mass spectrometry based proteomic profiling upon SOCS2 depletion and yield quantitative data for similar to 4200 proteins. Through this screen we identify a novel target of SOCS2, the serine-threonine kinase NDR1. Over-expression of SOCS2 accelerates turnover, while its knockdown stabilizes, endogenous NDR1 protein. SOCS2 interacts with NDR1 and promotes its degradation through K48-linked ubiquitination. Functionally, over-expression of SOCS2 antagonizes NDR1- induced TNF alpha-stimulated NF-kappa B activity. Conversely, depletion of NDR1 rescues the effect of SOCS2-deficiency on TNF alpha-induced NF-kappa B transactivation. Using a SOCS2(-/-) mice model of colitis we show that SOCS2-deficiency is pro-inflammatory and negatively correlates with NDR1 and nuclear p65 levels. Lastly, we provide evidence to suggest that NDR1 acts as an oncogene in prostate cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an identified E3 ligase for NDR1. These results might explain how SOCS2-deficiency leads to hyper-activation of NF-kappa B and downstream pathological implications and posits that SOCS2 induced degradation of NDR1 may act as a switch in restricting TNF alpha-NF-kappa B pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据