4.7 Article

Non-canonical NFκB activation promotes chemokine expression in podocytes

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep28857

关键词

-

资金

  1. FEDER funds
  2. FIS ISCIII-RETIC REDinREN [RD12/0021, PI15/00298, PI13/00047, CP14/00133, CP12/03262]
  3. Spanish Society of Nephrology
  4. FRIAT-IRSIN
  5. Comunidad de Madrid (CIFRA) [S2010/BMD-2378]
  6. CYTED IBERERC
  7. Programa Intensificacion Actividad Investigadora (ISCIII)
  8. Miguel Servet
  9. FIS
  10. ABS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) receptor Fn14 is expressed by podocytes and Fn14 deficiency protects from experimental proteinuric kidney disease. However, the downstream effectors of TWEAK/Fn14 in podocytes are poorly characterized. We have explored TWEAK activation of non-canonical NF kappa B signaling in cultured podocytes. In cultured podocytes, TWEAK increased the expression of the chemokines CCL21, CCL19 and RANTES in a time-dependent manner. The inhibitor of canonical NF kappa B activation parthenolide inhibited the CCL19 and the early RANTES responses, but not the CCL21 or late RANTES responses. In this regard, TWEAK induced non-canonical NF kappa B activation in podocytes, characterized by NF kappa B2/p100 processing to NF kappa B2/p52 and nuclear migration of RelB/p52. Silencing by a specific siRNA of NIK, the upstream kinase of the non-canonical NF kappa B pathway, prevented CCL21 upregulation but did not modulate CCL19 or RANTES expression in response to TWEAK, thus establishing CCL21 as a non-canonical NF kappa B target in podocytes. Increased kidney Fn14 and CCL21 expression was also observed in rat proteinuric kidney disease induced by puromycin, and was localized to podocytes. In conclusion, TWEAK activates the non-canonical NF kappa B pathway in podocytes, leading to upregulation of CCL21 expression. The non-canonical NF kappa B pathway should be explored as a potential therapeutic target in proteinuric kidney disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据