4.7 Article

Electrostatically-guided inhibition of Curli amyloid nucleation by the CsgC-like family of chaperones

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep24656

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [100280, 104833]
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM118651]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1094106] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1234610] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/J006874/1B, G1001664, 1365661] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Wellcome Trust [100280/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [G1001664, MR/J006874/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Wellcome Trust [100280/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polypeptide aggregation into amyloid is linked with several debilitating human diseases. Despite the inherent risk of aggregation-induced cytotoxicity, bacteria control the export of amyloid-prone subunits and assemble adhesive amyloid fibres during biofilm formation. An Escherichia protein, CsgC potently inhibits amyloid formation of curli amyloid proteins. Here we unlock its mechanism of action, and show that CsgC strongly inhibits primary nucleation via electrostatically-guided molecular encounters, which expands the conformational distribution of disordered curli subunits. This delays the formation of higher order intermediates and maintains amyloidogenic subunits in a secretion-competent form. New structural insight also reveal that CsgC is part of diverse family of bacterial amyloid inhibitors. Curli assembly is therefore not only arrested in the periplasm, but the preservation of conformational flexibility also enables efficient secretion to the cell surface. Understanding how bacteria safely handle amyloidogenic polypeptides contribute towards efforts to control aggregation in disease-causing amyloids and amyloid-based biotechnological applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据