4.7 Article

Imaging and radiation effects of gold nanoparticles in tumour cells

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep19442

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0502183] Funding Source: Medline
  2. EPSRC [EP/I005714/1, EP/K039342/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. MRC [G0502183] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. STFC [ST/K001957/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I005714/1, EP/K039342/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G0502183] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K001957/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gold nanoparticle radiosensitization represents a novel technique in enhancement of ionising radiation dose and its effect on biological systems. Variation between theoretical predictions and experimental measurement is significant enough that the mechanism leading to an increase in cell killing and DNA damage is still not clear. We present the first experimental results that take into account both the measured biodistribution of gold nanoparticles at the cellular level and the range of the product electrons responsible for energy deposition. Combining synchrotron-generated monoenergetic X-rays, intracellular gold particle imaging and DNA damage assays, has enabled a DNA damage model to be generated that includes the production of intermediate electrons. We can therefore show for the first time good agreement between the prediction of biological outcomes from both the Local Effect Model and a DNA damage model with experimentally observed cell killing and DNA damage induction via the combination of X-rays and GNPs. However, the requirement of two distinct models as indicated by this mechanistic study, one for short-term DNA damage and another for cell survival, indicates that, at least for nanoparticle enhancement, it is not safe to equate the lethal lesions invoked in the local effect model with DNA damage events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据