4.7 Article

A Mendelian randomization study of testosterone and cognition in men

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep21306

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Hong Kong Foundation for Development and Research (Hong Kong, China)
  2. University of Hong Kong University Research Committee Strategic Research Theme of Public Health (Hong Kong, China)
  3. Guangzhou Public Health Bureau (Guangzhou, China) [2012J5100041]
  4. Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau (Guangzhou, China)
  5. University of Birmingham (Birmingham, United Kingdom)
  6. Research Grant Council General Research Fund [769710]
  7. Research Grant Council of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Testosterone replacement for older men is increasingly common, with some observations suggesting a protective effect on cognitive function. We examined the association of endogenous testosterone with cognitive function among older men in a Mendelian randomization study using a separate-sample instrumental variable (SSIV) analysis estimator to minimize confounding and reverse causality. A genetic score predicting testosterone was developed in 289 young Chinese men from Hong Kong, based on selected testosterone-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs10046, rs1008805 and rs1256031). The association of genetically predicted testosterone with delayed 10-word recall score and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was assessed at baseline and follow-up using generalized estimating equation among 4,212 older Chinese men from the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study. Predicted testosterone was not associated with delayed 10-word recall score (-0.02 per nmol/L testosterone, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.06-0.02) or MMSE score (0.06, 95% CI -0.002-0.12). These estimates were similar after additional adjustment for age, education, smoking, use of alcohol, body mass index and the Framingham score. Our findings do not corroborate observed protective effects of testosterone on cognitive function among older men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据