4.6 Article

Morphology evolution and impurity analysis of LiFePO4 nanoparticles via a solvothermal synthesis process

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 99, 页码 56074-56083

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra09484k

关键词

-

资金

  1. MOST [2013CB934000, 2011CB935902, 2014DFG71590, 2010DFA72760, 2011CB711202, 2013AA050903, 2011AA11A257, 2011AA11A254]
  2. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [2010THZ08116, 2011THZ08139, 2011THZ01004, 2012THZ08129]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy [ZZ2012-011]
  4. Suzhou (Wujiang) Automotive Research Institute [2012WJ-A-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A solvothermal method is applied for synthesizing LiFePO4 nanoparticles using ethylene glycol as solvent. Crystals are obtained with quite different morphologies at solutions of various acidity prepared via changing the primary LiOH/H3PO4 mole ratios. SEM, TEM, and HRTEM are used to analyze the samples. Element distribution in solid LiFePO4 particles, mother solutions and washing solutions are tracked by ICP-OES and pH tests. Morphological test results show that the main exposed faces of samples transform from (100) as a rectangular shape to (010) as a spindle shape with the pH of the mother solutions increasing. Samples with predominant (010) faces are formed at less acidic solvothermal solutions. At the intermediate pH from 3.11 to 3.73, powders like long hexagon nanorods are synthesized with (100) and (010) faces exposed. XRD results show that the long hexagon nanorods have better crystal structures when synthesized at LiOH/H3PO4 = 2.7-3.0. Impurities like Fe3O4, Li3PO4, etc. are detected in the spindle shape LiFePO4 powders. The amount of impurities is related to the synthesis process and increases with the pH of solvothermal solution increasing. High temperature treatment is useful for impurities transforming to LiFePO4 and thus reduces the impurities. The long hexagon nanorods show better electrochemical performances: 169.9 mA h g(-1) at 0.1 C, and 129.8 mA h g(-1) at 10 C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据