4.6 Article

Recent molecular engineering of room temperature ionic liquid electrolytes for mesoscopic dye-sensitized solar

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 45, 页码 23521-23532

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra44209h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA03Z218, 2011AA050522]
  2. International Cooperation S&T Cooperation Program of China [2010DFA64360, 2013DFG53010]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50672041, 51272126]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2062013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past decade, room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) have been widely recognized as alternative green, tunable and robust electrolytes for mesoscopic dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) due to their unique properties. The negligible volatility of RTILs renders them more suitable than molecular solvents for longterm device use, while the high thermal and electrochemical stability fulfill the essential requirements for electrolyte applications. In spite of the relatively high viscosities of common RTIL iodides, the mass transport limitations can be effectively alleviated by the contribution of a Grotthous-type charge exchange mechanism. More interestingly, the physicochemical properties of RTILs can be facilely tuned by tailoring their cationic and anionic structures, which provides great feasibility for the specific designing of application-oriented RTILs. In this Feature Article, recent progress on highly efficient DSCs with RTIL electrolytes are summarized, with a special focus on the structural-dependence of the ionic diffusion property in RTIL electrolytes, as well as the charge transport and recombination kinetics at RTIL electrolytes/dye molecule/TiO2 electrodes interfaces. Furthermore, recent advances in RTIL electrolytes with iodine-free redox couples have been reviewed. Crucial issues that should be addressed in the pursuit of future developing low-cost and high-efficient RTIL electrolytes are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据