4.3 Article

Developing a bone mineral density test result letter to send to patients: a mixed-methods study

期刊

PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 827-841

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S60106

关键词

osteoporosis; DXA; test results; patient education; fracture risk; patient activation

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Comprehensive Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA
  2. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [AR062133]
  3. National Institute on Aging at the US National Institutes of Health [R01 AG033035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To use a mixed-methods approach to develop a letter that can be used to notify patients of their bone mineral density (BMD) results by mail that may activate patients in their bone-related health care. Patients and methods: A multidisciplinary team developed three versions of a letter for reporting BMD results to patients. Trained interviewers presented these letters in a random order to a convenience sample of adults, aged 50 years and older, at two different health care systems. We conducted structured interviews to examine the respondents' preferences and comprehension among the various letters. Results: A total of 142 participants completed the interview. A majority of the participants were female (64.1%) and white (76.1%). A plurality of the participants identified a specific version of the three letters as both their preferred version (45.2%; P < 0.001) and as the easiest to understand (44.6%; P < 0.01). A majority of participants preferred that the letters include specific next steps for improving their bone health. Conclusion: Using a mixed-methods approach, we were able to develop and optimize a printed letter for communicating a complex test result (BMD) to patients. Our results may offer guidance to clinicians, administrators, and researchers who are looking for guidance on how to communicate complex health information to patients in writing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据