3.8 Editorial Material

Adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab are equally effective treatments for patients with psoriatic arthritis

期刊

NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 4, 期 10, 页码 510-511

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncprheum0880

关键词

anti-TNF agents; efficacy; psoriatic arthritis; randomized controlled trials; safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a recent meta-analysis of the risks and benefits of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapies in patients with psoriatic arthritis, Saad et al. found that adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab were all significantly more effective than placebo for all outcome measures analyzed. There were no differences between these anti-TNF inhibitors in achieving the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) response for joint disease. A difference in the efficacy of the anti-TNF agents for treatment of skin manifestations was reported; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Analysis of other disease manifestations would have been interesting, as there is a clinical perception of a better response to treatment with anti-TNF antibodies (i.e. adalimumab and infliximab) versus the TNF receptor (i.e. etanercept). When comparing the anti-TNF agents with placebo in terms of safety, the only significant difference was an increased incidence of injection-site reactions associated with etanercept therapy. As all three drugs were shown to be equally effective in the management of psoriatic arthritis, patients should be allowed to make treatment choices based on whether they prefer the flexibility of self injection or whether they find repeated injections unacceptable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据