4.6 Article

Selecting food web models using normalized maximum likelihood

期刊

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 551-562

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12192

关键词

model selection; minimum description length; normalized maximum likelihood; cascade model; niche model; modularity; group model; AIC; BIC; Bayes factors

类别

资金

  1. NSF [1042164, 1148867]
  2. AXA postdoctoral research fellowship
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [0827493] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1148867] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Emerging Frontiers [0827493] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. SBE Off Of Multidisciplinary Activities
  8. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1042164] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecological models link theory and data. They distil processes into a mathematical form that explains the salient features of observed data. Food webs describe the pattern of interactions between species in an ecosystem, and many models have been proposed to explain their structure. When selecting the most appropriate model for data, it is important to penalize against overly complicated models. Here, we introduce to ecology the use of normalized maximum likelihood (NML) for model selection and demonstrate its application to models for food web structure. Unlike AIC, which penalizes models using the number of parameters, NML normalizes the likelihood of data given a model by the sum of likelihoods for all possible food webs with the same number of species. NML favours models that fit observed data well and all other data sets poorly, in contrast with overly flexible models that fit many (unobserved) data sets by the same amount and thus provide little information on the system under investigation. As such, NML represents a natural measure for comparing very different models and enables ecologists to determine not only whether a particular model is superior to others, but also whether, objectively, the model is a poor description of data. We used NML to compare models from four popular model families (cascade, niche, modular and group) and found that the best models performed much better than random graphs incorporating no ecological principles. However, models specified by empirical characteristics such as species body mass, taxonomic classification or habitat were frequently far-from-optimal and, in some cases, performed worse than random graphs. This suggests that ecological interactions cannot be explained by a single species trait or coarse-grained environmental factor. The ranking of empirically determined models using NML was generally consistent with model selection according to AIC, BIC and Bayes factors. We also show how NML can improve the development of new model families by measuring the effectiveness of incremental changes to existing families or combining families. NML offers ecologists a rigorous and elegant framework for revealing the defining features of data through the systematic formulation, testing and modification of models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据