4.6 Article

The Effect of a Scanning Strategy on the Residual Stress of 316L Steel Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting (SLM)

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma11101821

关键词

selective laser melting; divisional scanning; residual stress; deformation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775196]
  2. Guangdong Province Science and Technology Project [2017B090912003, 2017A050501058, 2015B010125006]
  3. High-level Personnel Special Support Plan of Guangdong Province [2016TQ03X289]
  4. Guangzhou Pearl River New Talent Project [201710010064]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018ZD30]
  6. China Scholarship Council [201706155082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The laser scanning strategy has an important influence on the surface quality, residual stress, and deformation of the molten metal (deformation behavior). A divisional scanning strategy is an effective means used to reduce the internal stress of the selective laser melting (SLM) metal part. In order to understand and optimize the divisional scanning strategy, three divisional scanning strategies and an S-shaped orthogonal scanning strategy are used to produce 316L steel parts in this study. The influence of scanning strategy on the produced parts is verified from the aspects of densification, residual stress distribution and deformation. Experiments show that the 316L steel alloy parts adopted spiral divisional scanning strategy can not only obtain the densification of 99.37%, but they also effectively improve the distribution of residual stress and control the deformation degree of the produced parts. Among them, the spiral divisional scanning sample has the smallest residual stress in plane direction, and its sigma(x) and sigma(y) stress are controlled within 204 MPa and 103 MPa. The above results show that the spiral divisional scanning is the most conducive strategy to obtain higher residual stress performance of SLM 316L steel parts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据