4.5 Article

Genome-wide RNAi screening implicates the E3 ubiquitin ligase Sherpa in mediating innate immune signaling by Toll in Drosophila adults

期刊

SCIENCE SIGNALING
卷 8, 期 400, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2005971

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  3. Program for the Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences
  4. Global COE Research Grant (Tohoku University Ecosystem Adaptability)
  5. Takeda Science Foundation
  6. Kao Foundation for Arts and Sciences
  7. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  8. Futaba Electronics Memorial Foundation
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K18855] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Drosophila Toll pathway plays important roles in innate immune responses against Gram-positive bacteria and fungi. To identify previously uncharacterized components of this pathway, we performed comparative, ex vivo, genome-wide RNA interference screening. In four screens, we overexpressed the Toll adaptor protein dMyd88, the downstream kinase Pelle, or the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) homolog Dif, or we knocked down Cactus, the Drosophila homolog of mammalian inhibitor of NF-kappa B. On the basis of these screens, we identified the E3 ubiquitin ligase Sherpa as being necessary for the activation of Toll signaling. A loss-of-function sherpa mutant fly exhibited compromised production of antimicrobial peptides and enhanced susceptibility to infection by Gram-positive bacteria. In cultured cells, Sherpa mediated ubiquitylation of dMyd88 and Sherpa itself, and Sherpa and Drosophila SUMO (small ubiquitin-like modifier) were required for the proper membrane localization of an adaptor complex containing dMyd88. These findings highlight a role for Sherpa in Drosophila host defense and suggest the SUMOylation-mediated regulation of dMyd88 functions in Toll innate immune signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据