4.0 Article

Partial hepatectomy improves the outcome of intraportal islet transplantation by promoting revascularization

期刊

ISLETS
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 138-144

出版社

LANDES BIOSCIENCE
DOI: 10.4161/isl.19491

关键词

diabetes; intraportal; islet transplantation; partial hepatectomy; revascularization

资金

  1. NIH/NIDDK [DK077541]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Revascularization of grafts is one of the important key factors for the success of islet transplantation. After partial hepatectomy, many growth factors such as hepatocyte growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor are increased in the remnant liver. These growth factors have properties that promote angiogenesis. This might be an optimal environment for revascularization of islets transplanted intraportally. To verify this hypothesis, syngeneic islets (330 per recipient) were transplanted into the right hepatic lobes of streptozotocin-induced diabetic Balb/c mice with (hepatectomy group) or without (control group) left liver resection. Blood glucose was monitored for 28 d after transplantation. Glucose tolerance test was performed on post-operative day (POD) 30, and histological assessments were performed on POD 7 and 30 respectively. Analysis revealed that 36.7% of the control and 90.0% of the hepatectomy mice attained normoglycemia during the observation period (*p = 0.0142). Glucose tolerance was improved in the hepatectomy group (Area under the curve of intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests on POD 30, Control; 47,700 +/- 5,890 minmg/dl, Hepatectomy; 26,000 +/- 2,060 minmg/dl: **p = 0.00314). Revascularization of grafted islets was more pronounced in the hepatectomy group (Vessel number per islet area on POD 7, Control; 3.20 +/- 0.463 x 10(-4)/mu m(2), Hepatectomy; 7.08 +/- 0.513 x 10(-4)/mu m(2): **p < 0.01). In the present study, partial hepatectomy (30%) improved the outcome of intraportal islet transplantation. Revascularization of islets transplanted into the liver may have been promoted by the induction of liver regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据