4.4 Article

Regional cortical thinning in multiple sclerosis and its relation with cognitive impairment: A multicenter study

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 901-909

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458515607650

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; MRI; cortical atrophy; cognitive impairment

资金

  1. Dutch MS Research Foundation [09-358d, 08-648]
  2. MAGNIMS-ECTRIMS fellowship
  3. MS Society of Great Britain
  4. MS Society of Northern Ireland
  5. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospital (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The objectives of this paper are to compare in a multicenter setting patterns of regional cortical thickness in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and cognitive impairment (CI) and those cognitively preserved (CP), and explore the relationship between cortical thinning and cognitive performance. Methods: T1-weighted isotropic brain scans were collected at 3T from seven European centers in 60 RRMS patients and 65 healthy controls (HCs). Patients underwent clinical and neuropsychological examinations. Cortical thickness (CTh) measures were calculated using FreeSurfer (failing in four) and both lobar and vertex-based general linear model (GLM) analyses were compared between study groups. Results: Twenty (36%) MS patients were classified as CI. Mean global CTh was smaller in RRMS patients compared to HCs (left 2.43 vs. 2.53 mm, right 2.44 vs. 2.54 mm, p < 0.001). Multivariate GLM regional analysis showed significantly more temporal thinning in CI compared to CP patients. Verbal memory scores correlated to regional cortical thinning in the insula whereas visual memory scores correlated to parietal thinning. Conclusions: This multicenter study showed mild global cortical thinning in RRMS. The extent of thinning is less pronounced than previously reported. Only subtle regional differences between CI and CP patients were observed, some of which related to specific cognitive domains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据