4.5 Review

Cellular and molecular basis of cerebellar development

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROANATOMY
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2013.00018

关键词

rostral hindbrain; caudal mesencephalon; cerebellum; isthmus; isthmic organizer; isthmic constriction; Fgf8; morphogenesis

资金

  1. European Consortium: EUCOMMTOOLS [261492]
  2. Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance (FARA)
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [BFU-2011-27326, CSD2007-00023]
  4. Institute of health Carlos III: Red TERCEL [RD06/001/0023, RD12/0019/0024]
  5. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO(2009/028)]
  6. Fundacion Sindrome 5p-
  7. Asociacion Walk on Project (WOP)
  8. Asociacion Granadina de Ataxia de Friedrich (ASOFAG)
  9. Fundacion Diogenes
  10. Fundacion MAPFRE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Historically, the molecular and cellular mechanisms of cerebellar development were investigated through structural descriptions and studying spontaneous mutations in animal models and humans. Advances in experimental embryology, genetic engineering, and neuroimaging techniques render today the possibility to approach the analysis of molecular mechanisms underlying histogenesis and morphogenesis of the cerebellum by experimental designs. Several genes and molecules were identified to be involved in the cerebellar plate regionalization, specification, and differentiation of cerebellar neurons, as well as the establishment of cellular migratory routes and the subsequent neuronal connectivity. Indeed, pattern formation of the cerebellum requires the adequate orchestration of both key morphogenetic signals, arising from distinct brain regions, and local expression of specific transcription factors. Thus, the present review wants to revisit and discuss these morphogenetic and molecular mechanisms taking place during cerebellar development in order to understand causal processes regulating cerebellar cytoarchitecture, its highly topographically ordered circuitry and its role in brain function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据